Stop Tax Haven Abuse
Act,
from the
International Association of
Risk and Compliance Professionals (IARCP)
A BILL
To restrict the use of offshore tax havens and abusive tax shelters
to inappropriately avoid Federal taxation, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE;
(a) Short Title- This Act may be cited as the
‘Stop Tax Haven Abuse
Act’.
TITLE I--DETERRING
THE USE OF TAX HAVENS FOR TAX EVASION
Sec. 101. Establishing
presumptions for entities and transactions involving offshore
secrecy jurisdictions.
Sec. 102. Authorizing special measures against foreign
jurisdictions, financial institutions, and others that impede United
States tax enforcement.
Sec. 103. Treatment of foreign corporations managed and controlled
in the United States as domestic corporations.
Sec. 104. Allowing more time for investigations involving offshore
secrecy jurisdictions.
Sec. 105. Reporting United States beneficial owners of foreign owned
financial accounts.
Sec. 106. Preventing misuse of foreign trusts for tax evasion.
Sec. 107. Limitation on legal opinion protection from penalties with
respect to transactions involving offshore secrecy jurisdictions.
Sec. 108. Closing the offshore dividend tax loophole.
Sec. 109. Reporting of activities with respect to passive foreign
investment companies.
TITLE II--OTHER MEASURES TO COMBAT TAX HAVEN AND TAX SHELTER ABUSES
Sec. 201. Penalty for failing
to disclose offshore holdings.
Sec. 202. Deadline for anti-money laundering rule for hedge funds
and private equity funds.
Sec. 203. Anti-money laundering requirements for formation agents.
Sec. 204. Strengthening summons in cases involving offshore secrecy
jurisdictions.
Sec. 205. Improving enforcement of foreign financial account
reporting.
TITLE III--COMBATING TAX SHELTER PROMOTERS
Sec. 301. Penalty for
promoting abusive tax shelters.
Sec. 302. Penalty for aiding and abetting the understatement of tax
liability.
Sec. 303. Tax planning inventions not patentable.
Sec. 304. Prohibited fee arrangement.
Sec. 305. Preventing tax shelter activities by financial
institutions.
Sec. 306. Information sharing for enforcement purposes.
Sec. 307. Disclosure of information to Congress.
Sec. 308. Tax opinion standards for tax practitioners.
Sec. 309. Denial of deduction for certain fines, penalties, and
other amounts.
TITLE IV--REQUIRING ECONOMIC SUBSTANCE
Sec. 401. Clarification of
economic substance doctrine.
Sec. 402. Penalty for understatements attributable to transactions
lacking economic substance, etc.
Sec. 403. Denial of deduction for interest on underpayments
attributable to noneconomic substance transactions.
March 17, 2009
Statement of Senator Carl Levin Before Senate Finance Committee
Hearing on Tax Issues Related to Ponzi Schemes and an Update on
Offshore Tax Haven Legislation
"Scope of the Problem
Each year, the United States loses an estimated $100 billion from U.S.
taxpayers using offshore tax schemes to dodge their U.S. tax
obligations. Those offshore shenanigans cheat honest U.S. taxpayers
who pay their fair share and rob the U.S. Treasury of funds needed for
the operations of our government.
The Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, which I chair, has
dedicated significant effort to combating offshore tax abuse. We’ve
exposed some of the facilitators – the lawyers, accountants,
broker-dealers, company formation agents, trust administrators, and
others that help clients dodge their U.S. tax obligations.
We’ve exposed some of the schemes, such as mass marketed tax shelters
peddled as investment strategies, networks of offshore trusts and
corporations with hidden assets, and deceptive offshore transactions
used to recast taxable income as allegedly tax free payments.
Here are just a few of the examples offshore tax abuse uncovered by
the Subcommittee:
Enron, with its 440 plus shell corporations in
the Cayman Islands;
KPMG, which sold the abusive FLIP and OPIS tax shelters employing
shell Cayman Island corporations as part of a scheme to generate phony
losses;
Two Americans who transferred over $190 million in stock options to 58
offshore trusts and corporations, which they secretly controlled, and
which they used to enjoy over $700 million in offshore profits, while
paying no taxes on that income; and
A U.S. tax shelter promoter that relied on $9.6 billion worth of
phantom stock trades between two offshore shell companies to generate
fake stock losses which were then used to shelter billions in income
for six U.S. taxpayers.
Offshore banks in tax havens that used code names, subterfuge, and
shell companies to help Americans hide billions of dollars from the
Treasury.
The hallmark of all these schemes is the use of offshore jurisdictions
that make it difficult, if not impossible for the IRS to find out what
the facts really are.
Switzerland and a major Swiss bank UBS provide a timely example. Just
last month UBS entered into a deferred prosecution agreement with the
Department of Justice in which they admitted to participating in a
scheme with certain U.S. taxpayers to defraud the United States of tax
revenue.
UBS agreed to pay a $780 million fine. Now our government is
attempting to identify and recover unpaid taxes from the tens of
thousands of U.S. citizens who hid $18 billion in income and assets in
UBS accounts.
UBS has refused to provide us the names of their clients, saying that
to do so would violate Swiss law. These actions show the inadequacies
of our tax treaties in protecting U.S. interests.
Stopping Offshore Tax Abuses
Tax havens sell secrecy to attract clients to their shores. They
peddle secrecy the way other countries advertise high quality products
or services. And though they go to great lengths to justify and defend
their practices, that secrecy is utilized by thousands of people to
cloak tax evasion and other misconduct.
The “Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act,” S. 506,
which I have introduced with Senators Whitehouse, McCaskill, Nelson,
and Shaheen and as cosponsors, offers a powerful set of tools to stop
offshore abuses and put tax dollars in the U.S. Treasury, where they
belong.
Our bill would:
ESTABLISH PRESUMPTIONS TO COMBAT OFFSHORE
SECRECY (§101) by allowing U.S. tax and securities law
enforcement to treat for tax purposes non-publicly traded offshore
entities as being controlled by the U.S. taxpayer who formed them,
sent them assets, received assets from them, or benefited from them,
unless the taxpayer shows otherwise.
IMPOSE TOUGHER REQUIREMENTS ON U.S. TAXPAYERS
USING OFFSHORE SECRECY JURISDICTIONS (§101) by authorizing
Treasury to develop a list of jurisdictions starting from an initial
34 jurisdictions identified in IRS court proceedings.
AUTHORIZE SPECIAL MEASURES TO STOP OFFSHORE TAX
ABUSES (§102) by giving Treasury authority to take special
measures against foreign jurisdictions and financial institutions that
impede U.S. tax enforcement, including by prohibiting U.S. banks from
doing business with them.
CURE THE UGLAND HOUSE PROBLEM OF SHELL COMPANIES
RUN FROM THE UNITED STATES CLAIMING FOREIGN STATUS (§103) by
treating foreign corporations that are managed primarily from the
United States and are publicly traded or have gross assets of $50
million or more as U.S. domestic corporations for income tax purposes.
STRENGTHEN DETECTION OF OFFSHORE ACTIVITIES
(§105) by requiring U.S. financial institutions that open
accounts for foreign entities controlled by U.S. clients, open
accounts in offshore secrecy jurisdictions for U.S. clients, or
establish entities in offshore secrecy jurisdictions for U.S. clients,
to report such actions to the IRS.
CLOSE OFFSHORE TRUST LOOPHOLES (§106) by
taxing distributions, gifts and loans from foreign trusts of real
estate, artwork, or jewelry to U.S. persons, and treating U.S. persons
who receive offshore trust assets as trust beneficiaries.
CLOSE THE OFFSHORE TAX DIVIDEND LOOPHOLE (§108)
by treating all U.S. corporate dividend-based payments to non-U.S.
persons as taxable income subject to withholding.
EXPAND IRS REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (§109)
for passive foreign investment companies (PFICs) to include not only
U.S. persons who own a PFIC but also those who have formed, sent
assets to, received assets from, or benefitted from a PFIC.
REQUIRE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING PROGRAMS (§203)
for hedge funds and company formation agents to ensure they screen
their clients and any offshore funds.
STRENGTHEN PENALTIES (§§301-302) on
persons who aid or abet tax evasion by increasing the maximum fine to
150% of their gains, and on corporate insiders who hide offshore stock
holdings by increasing the maximum fine to $1 million per violation of
U.S. securities laws.
BAN TAX SHELTER PATENTS (§303) by
prohibiting the U.S. patent office from issuing patents for
“inventions” designed to minimize, eliminate, or defer taxes.
These provisions represent a partial list of the innovative measures
we’ve included in the bill to strengthen the ability of federal
regulators to combat offshore tax haven and tax shelter abuses.
One bill provision that has already caught the attention of some
offshore tax havens is a requirement that the Treasury Department
maintain a list of “Offshore Secrecy Jurisdictions” that have
corporate, bank, or tax secrecy rules or industry practices, and a
poor record of cooperation with U.S. tax enforcement. S. 506 doesn’t
attempt to do what we don’t have the power to do: change any
jurisdiction’s secrecy laws or tax rates.
Instead, the bill aims at making it more difficult for U.S. taxpayers
to use offshore secrecy laws and practices to hide essential facts
from the IRS. It would greatly strengthen the IRS’ ability to collect
tax dollars hidden offshore. Americans will still be free to utilize
banks in tax haven jurisdictions for legitimate purposes, but in a
court of law the burden will shift to the taxpayers to prove that they
don’t control the corporations and trusts they’ve established or
financed in those jurisdictions.
Recent Developments
Last week, in response to growing international pressure and spurred
in part by the work of my Subcommittee, several offshore secrecy
jurisdictions, including Andorra, Austria,
Belgium, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, and Switzerland, announced
significant changes in how they will apply their bank secrecy laws.
Each of these countries seems to say that it will no longer use
secrecy laws to help people evade taxes, and will begin exchanging
information on all types of alleged tax evasion, not just so-called
‘tax fraud.’
That is a very welcome development which is long overdue, and we look
forward to effective implementation of the promised new policies.
Hopefully, dozens of other secrecy jurisdictions which have cost the
U.S. Treasury so many billions of dollars will follow suit.
At the same time, the promised new limits on offshore secrecy will not
only likely take years to implement, but even after taking effect,
will not eliminate all offshore tax abuses. For example, even after
implementation of the proposed reforms, the IRS will still be at a
disadvantage in trying to obtain notice of abusive accounts, the names
on those accounts, and in proving beneficial ownership and control of
the accounts in court.
That’s why Congress needs to enact the Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act to
strengthen U.S. offshore tax enforcement and help end offshore abuses
that enable U.S. tax cheats to offload their tax burden onto the backs
of honest, hardworking taxpayers.
Conclusion
These are exceedingly difficult times. The economy is in turmoil; the
unemployment rate is as high as it has been in a generation and
rising. Congress just passed an unprecedented stimulus package in
order to get the economy back on track, but it comes at a significant
cost to the Treasury.
Now more than ever, the government needs to collect all of the money
it is lawfully owed. Tax cheats make it harder to maintain our
highways, protect our borders, advance medical research, and inspect
our food.
They make it difficult to give needed tax relief to small businesses
and middle-income victims of the alternative minimum tax. And at a
time when the government must borrow hundreds of billions of dollars
to shore up our financial system and stimulate our economy, tax cheats
deepen the deficit and threaten the economic well-being of our
children and grandchildren.
We must vigorously enforce our tax laws. S. 506 offers a set of
practical and innovative tools that would help shut down offshore tax
cheats and begin to reduce the $100 billion offshore tax gap that
forces honest taxpayers to shoulder a greater tax burden than they
would otherwise have to bear.
I applaud Chairman Baucus and Ranking Member Grassley for their
willingness to tackle offshore tax abuses. I look forward to working
with the Committee on legislation this year to reduce this unfair
drain on our treasury."
INTRODUCED:
March 3, 2009
Statement of Senator Carl Levin on President
Obama's Support of Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act
Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the Senate Permanent
Subcommittee on Investigations, issued the following statement today:
“President Obama’s support for the Stop Tax
Haven Abuse Act, as announced by Treasury Secretary Geithner at
a Ways and Means Committee hearing today, is very welcome news and
greatly improves the chances of an offshore tax bill becoming law this
year.
It also sends a strong signal to tax havens that this Administration
is not going to tolerate the kind of offshore tax abuses that have
been draining $100 billion a year from the U.S. Treasury and that, as
a result, offload the tax burden onto the backs of honest taxpayers.
I hope that Secretary Geithner will now add his voice to the chorus of
nations calling for action to be taken at the G20 meeting in April to
clamp down on offshore secrecy jurisdictions that impede tax
enforcement.”
From the Act
"Each of the following foreign jurisdictions, which have been
previously and publicly identified by the Internal Revenue Service as
secrecy jurisdictions in Federal court proceedings, shall be deemed
listed by the Secretary as an offshore secrecy jurisdiction:
`(i) Anguilla.
`(ii) Antigua and Barbuda.
`(iii) Aruba.
`(iv) Bahamas.
`(v) Barbados.
`(vi) Belize.
`(vii) Bermuda.
`(viii) British Virgin Islands.
`(ix) Cayman Islands.
`(x) Cook Islands.
`(xi) Costa Rica.
`(xii) Cyprus.
`(xiii) Dominica.
`(xiv) Gibraltar.
`(xv) Grenada.
`(xvi) Guernsey/Sark/Alderney.
`(xvii) Hong Kong.
`(xviii) Isle of Man.
`(xix) Jersey.
`(xx) Latvia.
`(xxi) Liechtenstein.
`(xxii) Luxembourg.
`(xxiii) Malta.
`(xxiv) Nauru.
`(xxv) Netherlands Antilles.
`(xxvi) Panama.
`(xxvii) Samoa.
`(xxviii) St. Kitts and Nevis.
`(xxix) St. Lucia.
`(xxx) St. Vincent and the Grenadines.
`(xxxi) Singapore.
`(xxxii) Switzerland.
`(xxxiii) Turks and Caicos.
`(xxxiv) Vanuatu.
March 2, 2009
Senate, House Members Introduce Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act
Stating that “tax havens are engaged in economic warfare against the
United States, and honest, hardworking Americans,”
Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., Sen. Sheldon
Whitehouse, D-RI, Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo. and Sen. Bill Nelson,
D-Fla., today introduced comprehensive legislation to stop
offshore tax haven and tax shelter abuses.
A companion bill was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives
by over 40 Members led by Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Tex. and Rep. Rosa
DeLauro, D-Conn.
Offshore tax abuses cost the U.S. Treasury an estimated $100 billion
each year in lost tax revenues, including $40-$70 billion from
individuals and $30-$60 billion from corporations. Abusive domestic
tax shelters cost tens of billions of dollars more.
“Offshore tax haven and tax shelter abuses are undermining the
integrity of our tax system and increasing the tax burden on middle
income families,” said Levin, chairman of the
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations which has conducted
numerous inquiries into offshore abuses.
“We cannot tolerate $100 billion in offshore tax abuses burning a hole
through our budget each year. We can fight back against secrecy
jurisdictions and shut down offshore tax abuses if we have the
political will. This bill provides a powerful set of new tools to
clamp down on offshore tax and tax shelter abuses.”
“When over 80% of our largest companies have subsidiaries in tax
havens, and one major recipient of taxpayer bailout monies achieves a
1% effective tax rate through ‘changes in geographic earnings mix,’ it
is long past time to take effective action to stop offshore tax
dodging.” said Congressman Doggett, a senior
member of the House Ways and Means and Budget Committees, and a
long-time foe of offshore tax havens.
“These outrageous tax havens add to the soaring budget deficit and
shift the tax burden to small businesses and families, who play by the
rules.”
The Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act is an improved
version of legislation introduced in the last Congress by Levin, Sen.
Norm Coleman, R-Minn., then Sen. Barack Obama, and others in the
Senate and by Doggett and over 40 cosponsors in the House,
including then Rep. Rahm Emanuel.
The bill has been strengthened with the addition of three new
provisions that would:
(1) treat foreign corporations managed and controlled in the United
States as domestic corporations for income tax purposes;
(2) close an offshore tax dividend loophole that enables non-U.S
persons to dodge payment of U.S. taxes on U.S. stock dividends; and
(3) expand the tax return reporting requirements for passive foreign
investment corporations (PFICs) to include U.S. persons who don’t own
a PFIC, but have formed, sent assets to, received assets from, or
benefitted from a PFIC.
The bill will be referred to the Finance Committee in the Senate and
the Ways and Means Committee in the House.
Among other measures, the 84-page bill would:
ESTABLISH PRESUMPTIONS TO COMBAT OFFSHORE
SECRECY (§101) by allowing U.S. tax and securities law
enforcement to treat for tax purposes non-publicly traded offshore
entities as being controlled by the U.S. taxpayer who formed them,
sent them assets, received assets from them, or benefited from them,
unless the taxpayer proves otherwise.
IMPOSE TOUGHER REQUIREMENTS ON U.S. TAXPAYERS
USING OFFSHORE SECRECY JURISDICTIONS (§101) by authorizing
Treasury to develop a list of jurisdictions starting from an initial
34 jurisdictions identified in IRS court proceedings.
AUTHORIZE SPECIAL MEASURES TO STOP OFFSHORE TAX
ABUSES (§102) by giving Treasury authority to take special
measures against foreign jurisdictions and financial institutions that
impede U.S. tax enforcement.
CURE THE UGLAND HOUSE PROBLEM OF SHELL COMPANIES
RUN FROM THE UNITED STATES CLAIMING FOREIGN STATUS (§103) by
treating foreign corporations that are publicly traded or have gross
assets of $50 million or more and whose management and control occurs
primarily in the United States as U.S. domestic corporations for
income tax purposes.
STRENGTHEN DETECTION OF OFFSHORE ACTIVITIES
(§105) by requiring U.S. financial institutions that open
accounts for foreign entities controlled by U.S. clients, open
accounts in offshore secrecy jurisdictions for U.S. clients, or
establish entities in offshore secrecy jurisdictions for U.S. clients,
to report such actions to the IRS.
CLOSE OFFSHORE TRUST LOOPHOLES (§106) by
taxing distributions, gifts and loans from foreign trusts of real
estate, artwork, or jewelry to U.S. persons, and treating U.S. persons
who receive offshore trust assets as trust beneficiaries.
CLOSE THE OFFSHORE TAX DIVIDEND LOOPHOLE (§108)
by treating all U.S. corporate dividend-based payments to non-U.S.
persons as taxable income subject to withholding.
EXPAND IRS REPORTING REQUIREMENTS (§109)
for passive foreign investment companies (PFICs) to include not only
U.S. persons who own a PFIC but also those who have formed, sent
assets to, received assets from, or benefitted from a PFIC.
REQUIRE ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING PROGRAMS (§203)
for hedge funds and company formation agents to ensure they screen
their clients and any offshore funds.
STRENGTHEN PENALTIES (§§301-302) on tax
shelter promoters by increasing the maximum fine to 150% of their
ill-gotten gains, and on corporate insiders who hide offshore stock
holdings by increasing the maximum fine to $1 million per violation of
U.S. securities laws.
BAN TAX SHELTER PATENTS (§303) by
prohibiting the U.S. patent office from issuing patents for
“inventions” designed to minimize, avoid, or defer taxes.
February 20, 2009
Senator Levin, Reps. DeLauro, Doggett and Levin
Urge the Administration to Address Tax Haven Abuse in Budget
In a letter to Office of Management and Budget
Director Peter Orszag, U.S. Senator Carl Levin (D-MI) and Reps. Rosa
DeLauro (D-CT), Lloyd Doggett (D-TX) and Sander Levin (D-MI) today
urged the Obama Administration to include measures from the
Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act in its upcoming fiscal year 2010 budget
proposal in order to prevent taxpayers from hiding their incomes
offshore at an annual cost of approximately $100 billion to the
federal government.
The letter cites a recently released Government Accountability Office
(GAO) report which found that 83 of the 100 largest publicly traded
U.S. corporations, including several that are receiving billions of
dollars in taxpayer money through the Treasury’s financial rescue
program, and 63 of the 100 largest U.S. federal contractors reported
having subsidiaries in tax havens or financial privacy jurisdictions.
The Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act, introduced
in the House by Representative Doggett and the Senate by Senator Levin
last session (H.R.2136, S.681) and soon to be reintroduced, would
deter the use of offshore secrecy jurisdictions, strengthen detection
of offshore abuses, increase penalties on tax shelter promoters, close
offshore tax loopholes, empower the Treasury Department to act against
foreign jurisdictions that impede U.S. tax enforcement, beef-up
disclosure of offshore transactions, and prohibit the issuance of tax
shelter patents.
“We write to express our deep concern with the continued practice by
most of the United States’ largest publicly traded companies -
including many federal contractors and recipients of financial bailout
funds - of using offshore tax havens or financial privacy
jurisdictions to avoid paying U.S. taxes,” the lawmakers write in the
letter.
“With estimated annual revenue losses of $100 billion a year as a
result of corporations hiding their income offshore, we strongly urge
you to consider proposals for shutting down offshore tax abuses as you
craft the administration’s proposed fiscal year 2010 budget.”
February 17, 2007
Levin, Coleman, Obama Introduce Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act -
Bill targets $100 billion in lost tax revenue each year
Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., and Sen. Barack
Obama, D-Ill., introduced comprehensive legislation to stop offshore
tax haven and tax shelter abuses.
For more than four years, Levin and Coleman, the Chairman and senior
Republican of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, have led
an in-depth Subcommittee investigation into offshore tax havens,
abusive tax shelters, and the professionals who design, market, and
implement these tax dodges.
Experts have estimated that the total loss to the Treasury from
offshore tax evasion alone approaches $100 billion per year, including
$40 to $70 billion from individuals and another $30 billion from
corporations engaging in offshore tax evasion. Abusive tax shelters
add tens of billions of dollars more.
“With a $345 billion annual tax gap and a $248 billion annual
deficit,” said Levin, “we cannot tolerate
a $100 billion drain on our Treasury each year from offshore tax
abuses.
We cannot tolerate tax cheats offloading their unpaid taxes onto the
backs of honest taxpayers. Offshore tax havens have declared economic
war on honest U.S. taxpayers by helping tax cheats hide income and
assets that should be taxed in the same way as other Americans.
This bill provides a powerful set of new tools to clamp down on
offshore tax and tax shelter abuses.”
“It is simply unacceptable that some individuals are using offshore
tax havens and secrecy jurisdictions to shelter trillions of dollars
in assets from taxation,” said Coleman.
“These tax schemes cause a massive revenue shortfall and, sadly, it is
the honest American taxpayer who must bear a disproportionate burden
of investing in areas like education and healthcare.
We are introducing this bill to close these loopholes, shut down
offshore tax schemes, and ensure that every American pays their fair
share of taxes.”
“This is a basic issue of fairness and integrity,”
said Obama. “We need to crack down on
individuals and businesses that abuse our tax laws so that those who
work hard and play by the rules aren’t disadvantaged.”
The Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act is a strengthened version of a tax reform
bill that Levin, Coleman, and Obama introduced in the last Congress.
The legislation was strengthened as a result of a year-long
Subcommittee investigation which resulted in a hearing and report on
August 1, 2006, examining a series of case studies showing how U.S.
taxpayers are using offshore secrecy jurisdictions to dodge U.S.
taxes.
“None of these offshore schemes would work,”
said Levin, “without the secrecy that prevents U.S. agencies
from enforcing our laws. Our bill offers innovative ways to combat
offshore secrecy. We can’t let the offshore tax havens hide $100
billion in U.S. tax revenues which are needed to protect our troops,
fund health care and education, and meet the other needs of American
families.”
Among other measures, the 68-page bill would:
ESTABLISH PRESUMPTIONS TO COMBAT OFFSHORE
SECRECY by allowing U.S. tax and securities law enforcement to
presume that non-publicly traded, offshore corporations and trusts are
controlled by the U.S. taxpayers who formed them or sent them assets,
unless the taxpayer proves otherwise;
IMPOSE TOUGHER REQUIREMENTS ON U.S. TAXPAYERS
USING OFFSHORE SECRECY JURISDICTIONS by listing 34
jurisdictions which have already been named in IRS court filings as
probable locations for U.S. tax evasion;
AUTHORIZE SPECIAL MEASURES TO STOP OFFSHORE TAX
ABUSES by giving Treasury authority to take special measures
against foreign jurisdictions and financial institutions that impede
U.S. tax enforcement;
STRENGTHEN DETECTION OF OFFSHORE ACTIVITIES
by requiring U.S. financial institutions that open accounts for
foreign entities controlled by U.S. clients, open accounts in offshore
secrecy jurisdictions for U.S. clients, or establish entities in
offshore secrecy jurisdictions for U.S. clients, to report such
actions to the IRS;
CLOSE OFFSHORE TRUST LOOPHOLES by taxing
offshore trust income used to buy real estate, artwork and jewelry for
U.S. persons, and treating as trust beneficiaries those persons who
actually receive offshore trust assets;
STRENGTHEN PENALTIES on tax shelter
promoters by increasing the maximum fine to 150% of their ill-gotten
gains, and on corporate insiders who hide offshore stock holdings by
increasing the maximum fine on them to $1 million per violation of
U.S. securities laws;
STOP TAX SHELTER PATENTS by prohibiting
the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office from issuing patents for
“inventions designed to minimize, avoid, defer, or otherwise affect
liability for Federal, State, local, or foreign tax”; and
REQUIRE HEDGE FUNDS AND COMPANY FORMATION AGENTS
TO KNOW THEIR OFFSHORE CLIENTS by requiring them to establish
anti-money laundering programs like other U.S. financial institutions,
under regulations to be issued by the Treasury Department.
TITLE I – Deterring the Use of Offshore Secrecy
Jurisdictions for Tax Evasion
Establish presumptions for entities and transactions in Offshore
Secrecy Jurisdictions. (§101)
Establishes rebuttable evidentiary presumptions in tax and securities
legal proceedings for non publicly-traded entities located in Offshore
Secrecy Jurisdictions. The presumptions are as follows:
Control – In a tax proceeding, if a U.S.
person (other than a publicly traded corporation) directly or
indirectly formed, transferred assets to, or was a beneficiary of, or
received distributions from an Offshore Secrecy Jurisdiction entity,
it will be presumed that the person exercised control over the entity.
Transfers of income – In a tax
proceeding, any amount or thing of value
transferred to a U.S. person (other than a publicly traded
corporation) directly or indirectly from an account or entity in an
Offshore Secrecy Jurisdiction, or transferred from such a U.S. person
directly or indirectly to an account or entity in an Offshore Secrecy
Jurisdiction, will be presumed to represent previously unreported
income to the U.S. person in the year of transfer.
Beneficial ownership – In a proceeding to
enforce securities law, if a U.S. person (other than a publicly traded
corporation) formed, transferred assets to, or benefited from an
Offshore Secrecy Jurisdiction entity (other than a publicly traded
corporation), it will be presumed that the person beneficially owned
and exercised control over such entity, regardless of the nominal
ownership.
Foreign financial accounts – Current law
requires that U.S. taxpayers report to the IRS any foreign financial
accounts containing at least $10,000 (known as an FBAR filing). Bill
establishes presumption that any account in an Offshore Secrecy
Jurisdiction contains funds sufficient to trigger this reporting
requirement.
These presumptions are needed in civil judicial and administrative
proceedings because the tax, corporate, or bank secrecy laws and
practices of these jurisdictions make it nearly impossible for U.S.
authorities to gain access to needed information. Presumptions may be
rebutted by clear and convincing evidence. No evidence may be accepted
from a non-U.S. person unless the person appears to testify in the
proceedings.
Treasury and SEC are authorized to issue regulations or guidance to
implement this section, and exempt classes of transactions, such as
corporate reorganizations, that do not present the potential for
abuse.
Determine “Offshore Secrecy Jurisdictions.”
(§101)
Provides initial list of 34 Offshore Secrecy Jurisdictions, while
giving Treasury Secretary discretion to add or subtract from the list
using certain criteria. Initial list of jurisdictions was taken from
IRS court filings identifying them as probable locations for U.S. tax
evasion:
Anguilla
Antigua and Barbuda Aruba Bahamas Barbados Belize Bermuda British
Virgin Islands Cayman Islands Cook Islands Costa Rica Cyprus Dominica
Gibraltar Grenada Guernsey/Sark/ Alderney Hong Kong Isle of Man Jersey
Latvia Lichtenstein Luxembourg Malta Nauru Netherlands Antilles Panama
Samoa St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Vincent and the Grenadines
Singapore Switzerland Turks and Caicos Vanuatu
Directs Treasury Secretary to list jurisdictions with secrecy laws or
practices that unreasonably restrict U.S. tax authorities from
obtaining needed information, unless the jurisdiction has information
exchange practices that effectively overcome those secrecy barriers.
Authorize special measures against foreign
jurisdictions, financial institutions, and others that impede U.S. tax
enforcement. (§102)
Currently, Treasury has the authority under §311 of the Patriot Act
(31 U.S.C. 5318(a)) to impose financial sanctions on foreign
jurisdictions, financial institutions, or transactions found to be of
“primary money laundering concern.”
Bill would authorize Treasury to impose the same sanctions on the same
types of entities if Treasury finds them to be “impeding U.S. tax
enforcement.” In addition, the bill would add to the list of possible
sanctions the ability to deny foreign banks the authority to issue
credit cards for use in the United States.
Allow more time for investigations involving
Offshore Secrecy Jurisdictions. (§103)
Extends from three years to six years the amount of time IRS has after
a return is filed to investigate and propose assessment of additional
tax if the case involves an Offshore Secrecy Jurisdiction.
Increase disclosure of offshore accounts,
transactions, and entities. (§104)
Requires any bank or securities firm that knows from its anti-money
laundering due diligence that the beneficial owner of one of its
foreign-owned financial accounts is a U.S. taxpayer, to file, in its
role as withholding agent, a 1099 form reporting account income of
that beneficial owner to the IRS.
Requires any financial institution directly or indirectly opening a
financial account or creating an entity in an Offshore Secrecy
Jurisdiction for a U.S. client to report the transaction to the IRS.
These filing requirements would be subject to the same penalties under
Title 26 presently applicable to forms 1099 and W-2, and bank and
securities regulators are given express authority to use their
existing enforcement authority to address failures to report.
Prevent misuse of foreign trusts for tax
evasion. (§105)
Attributes all powers and interests held by trust protectors of
foreign trusts to the U.S. trust grantor.
Treats a U.S. person who receives or uses cash or other property from
a foreign trust as a beneficiary of that trust, unless the exchange
was for fair market value.
Expands the list of taxable trust distributions to include loans of
real estate, marketable securities, and personal property of any kind,
including artwork, furnishings and jewelry.
Amends tax code to treat foreign trusts with current or future U.S.
beneficiaries, including contingent U.S. beneficiaries, as “grantor”
(i.e. taxable) trusts, rather than limiting that treatment to trusts
with current U.S. beneficiaries.
Limit legal opinion protection from penalties
with respect to transactions involving Offshore Secrecy Jurisdictions.
(§106)
Denies the penalty protections afforded by a legal opinion if the
transaction involves an Offshore Secrecy Jurisdiction. Treasury is
also authorized to exempt opinions that express a high confidence
level regarding the tax treatment of the transaction and opinions on
certain classes of transactions that are determined not to present the
potential for abuse addressed by the bill.
TITLE II – Other Measures to Combat Tax Haven and Tax Shelter Abuses
Increase penalty for failing to disclose offshore holdings. (§201)
Imposes penalty of up to $1 million per violation of U.S. securities
law on public companies or their officers, directors or major
shareholders who knowingly fail to disclose offshore holdings that
should have been reported to the SEC.
Set deadline for anti-money laundering rule for
hedge funds. (§202)
Requires Treasury, in consultation with SEC, to finalize a proposed
rule requiring unregistered investment companies, such as hedge funds
and private equity funds, to establish anti-money laundering programs
and submit suspicious activity reports. Requires rule to make it clear
that such unregistered investment companies must use due diligence to
evaluate investors supplying offshore funds and comply with same
requirements as other financial institutions for producing records.
Apply anti-money laundering requirements to
company formation agents. (§203)
Adds company formation agents to current list of those who must comply
with Bank Secrecy Act reporting requirements.
Requires Treasury to adopt regulations applying Bank Secrecy Act
requirements to company formation agents.
Strengthen summons in cases involving offshore
secrecy jurisdictions. (§204)
Improves use of John Doe summonses in cases
involving Offshore Secrecy Jurisdictions by:
allowing immediate summonses for U.S. correspondent account records of
financial institutions located in an Offshore Secrecy Jurisdiction;
authorizing courts to presume for any summons relating to transactions
in Offshore Secrecy Jurisdictions that there is a reasonable basis for
believing the case involves non-compliance with tax laws; and
permitting a court to authorize John Doe summonses on an open-ended
basis for three-year periods for project investigations, provided that
the court exercises ongoing oversight of the IRS summonses. The bill
requires GAO evaluation of this provision after five years.
Improve enforcement of foreign financial account
reporting. (§205)
Clarifies the authority of IRS agents investigating Foreign Bank
Account Report (FBAR) violations to use tax information in the
investigations; simplifies the calculation of FBAR penalties by tying
the penalty to the highest balance in the account during the reporting
period; and clarifies that Suspicious Activity Reports may be used for
civil, and not just criminal, tax law enforcement.
TITLE III – Preventing Abusive Tax Shelter Transactions
Strengthen tax shelter penalties
Strengthens penalties for:
promoting abusive tax shelters (§301)
knowingly aiding or abetting a taxpayer in understating tax liability
(§302)
Prohibit tax shelter patents (§303)
Prohibits the issuance of any patent designed to minimize, avoid,
defer or otherwise affect the liability for tax.
Prohibit tax service fees contingent upon
specific tax savings (§304)
Prohibits charging a fee for tax services in an amount that is
calculated according to or dependant upon a projected or actual amount
of tax savings or losses offsetting taxable income.
Deter financial institution participation in
abusive tax shelter activities (§305)
Requires federal bank regulators and the SEC to develop and utilize
examination techniques to detect violations by financial institutions
of the prohibition against providing products or services that aid or
abet tax evasion or that promote or implement abusive tax shelters and
report potential violations to the IRS.
Strengthen law enforcement through information
sharing (§§306-307)
Authorizes Treasury to share certain tax return information with the
SEC, federal bank regulators, or PCAOB, under certain circumstances,
to enhance tax shelter enforcement or combat financial accounting
fraud. Clarifies Congressional subpoena authority to obtain
information (but not a taxpayer return) from tax return preparers.
Clarifies Congressional authority to obtain certain tax information
(but not a taxpayer return) from Treasury related to an IRS decision
to grant, deny, revoke, or restore an organization’s tax exempt
status.
Require tougher tax shelter opinion standards
for tax practitioners (§308)
Codifies and expands Treasury’s authority to issue Circular 230
standards for tax practitioners providing “opinion letters” on
specific tax shelter transactions.
TITLE IV – Requiring Economic Substance Codify and strengthen the
economic substance doctrine (§§401-403)
Codifies and strengthens the economic substance doctrine to invalidate
transactions that have no meaningful economic substance or business
purpose apart from tax avoidance or evasion. Also increases penalties
for understatements attributable to a transaction lacking in economic
substance.
Links
|